Posts Tagged ‘punch and judy

At last Judy gets her revenge!!!

Couldn’t resist mentioning this article about a man hit by his partner with a rolling pin.

Today I spent the afternoon at The Hare and Hounds Bowland Bridge at their fun day.  The weather was cool but the rain decided to stay away which was fantastic.  I painted lots of faces, showed children and parents how to make balloon dogs and of course performed a Punch and Judy show.

I always get really nervous when performing Punch and Judy because adults have a preconceived idea of what the show should be like and children are not familiar with it so you have two different audiences to win over. The main aim is to eventually provoke a slanging match between you and the audience.

In most areas of life you succeed by being well planned and calm, and having been a teacher where writing plans and being calm was of paramount importance I try very hard to be well planned and professional.  When you do a Punch and Judy show you have to do the complete opposite as over planning a performance makes it staid and boring.

My show today had been planned to be very politically correct with minimal hitting and no wife beating but ended up being a fight between a pirate and Punch with a frying pan and a dog bone.  The audience, who were predominately fathers and sons, really got into it and by the end of the show  they demanded and encore and wanted Punch to fight with the crocodile.  The children were shouting at the puppets telling them they were not real and arguing with them when they said they were.  I have to thank a man and his dog who really taught the audience what to do by bantering with me – we even had a dog barking competition.

Afterwards the adult members of the audience thanked me and told me it had been a great show, little did they know that on occasions in my little booth I panicked about the show dying a death and the only reason it was a success was because I threw away my plans and  just went bonkers and put my heart and soul into my performance.

All of the older generation in the pub praised me about my performance, which was fantastic because they would be familiar with the tradition.  One even kept teasing me about my hideous trousers as if he was trying to be friendly but didn’t know what else to say.  However my trousers were hideous and people said they liked my pink hair but not my trousers, which were rainbow patterned and very baggy, so I won’t wear them again.

So next time I do a performance I am not going to be as uptight and just go with the flow.  My throat was sore and I was shattered after my afternoon’s work but I felt victorious.  When I got home my husband informed me that five hours with a boisterous three year old was tiring and monotonousness and it was my turn to deal with him.  You don’t say 😉



Is it appropriate for Punch and Judy shows to be completely traditional today?

by Sian Hunter on Thursday, 14 April 2011 at 19:11 ·

Having made a lucky find during the first month of Acepuppets we became the proud owners of an old traditional Punch and Judy theatre. It therefore seemed fitting to produce an Acepuppets version of the centuries old famous show.

The first question we had to ask was how true we would keep to tradition. After reading a number of scripts and history of Punch and Judy shows, there seems to be a general consensus that Punch is a psychotic, psychopathic cold blooded murderer who lacks regard for authority and fears no one, including the Devil. It would appear that Punch is indeed a physical manifestation of the ‘Id’ described by Freud where the person is no longer restrained by social constraints and acts without any regard to anyone else.

However another opinion is that Punch is in fact an anti – hero who rises above his bullies and disposes of them. He has a winging baby, a nagging wife and authority figures that are sometimes hypocritical in their approach to maintaining their power.

Whatever opinion you have about the force that drives punch to murder, the question still remains – is it appropriate to re –enact the show using age old traditional conventions or have we become so politically correct that it would be risky to expose delicate minds to such atrocities?

For example by making Punch the hero of the piece are we condoning wife beating, child abuse and murder? Is it fitting to show a complete disregard for authority by murdering a policeman and hangman because they are trying to punish him for his crime? Animal lovers could be up in arms because he kills a dog and crocodile, who, in some circumstances bite off his nose. Not to forgetting his mistress Pretty Polly the only person he seems to truly care about and only kisses her and treats her with kindness. Maybe Judy did nag him into insanity, the performance is only a snapshot into their lives, we are not really able to truly know the full story – it is for us to decide whether Punch is villain or victim.

If you were to omit the psychotic personality from Punch we then have to ask is if the show is still a Punch and Judy show? The phrase ‘There is no show without Punch’ maybe referring to his character rather than a physical representation in the form of a puppet. So a punch puppet may be present but due to a corrected personality he is no longer really Punch but another character that looks like Punch, rather like someone after they have encountered a head injury – they look the same but have become very different to the person they were before.

We also have to consider whether it would be the parents or the children who would be most disturbed by the content. I remember being very amused as a child when the Road Runner regularly blew up the coyote and Tom and Jerry took it in turns to beat each other up. I was always fully aware that the characters were figments of an animator’s imagination and that the characters couldn’t really die anyway because they weren’t real. By acting out taboo subjects using inanimate objects representing sections in society we allow ourselves to laugh without prejudice or guilt because comedy is always based on the negative sides of life. Stand up comedians draw laughs by highlighting deficiencies or peculiarities of people. A tame example is Peter Kaye and, ‘putting the big light on’. You laugh doubly at crude comedians firstly because it is funny and secondly because you are laughing and you shouldn’t so you are being a little bit naughty. Puppets are similar to cartoon characters in the fact that they are not real and therefore the crime being committed is not real, after all the puppets will be alive and well for their next performance.

Times have changed, we live in a contradictory world where openness is the name of the game and we are exposed to graphical pictures of death and destruction in the form of news reports, television programmes, computer games and even books. Sometimes reality and fiction merge and we become desensitised to the value of the destroyed lives we are privy to seeing – I have seen dead bodies on television but have chosen not to view deceased relatives because I wanted to remember them as they were when they were alive and yet all of the news channels seem to think it is fine for me to gawp at someone else’s dead relative – where is the respect in that? On the other hand people in authority are very concerned how we can cope with dealing with these images and try to protect us from feeling discriminated against and now we can claim compensation for hurt feelings and yet celebrities, who air their dirty laundry in public seem to have lives that would make Mr punch blush in embarrassment. In fact most reality shows laugh at vulnerable people who truly believe that they are the next ‘big thing’. Laughing at the pain of real people is much crueller than laughing at puppets that don’t have feelings at all.

Our audience is going to consist of children between the ages of three to nine so hopefully they won’t have been exposed to such horrors. This brings us to the question of what a child’s perception of Punch and Judy is. The whole performance revolves around the use of a ‘Slapstick’ which is used to slap and kill the other characters and of course it is the origin of slapstick comedy – you remember Laurel and Hardy hitting each other with a rotating ladder and Harold Lloyd getting stuck on poles attached to skyscrapers in New York. Slapstick used to be the greatest form of comedy entertainment but has diminished recently due to the fact that people are no longer able to laugh at themselves as easily as in the past and ‘Health and Safety’, which has improved our lives significantly, (you only have to look at documentaries of countries where there is no protection for employees and they live in a Victorian environment to see how much.) unfortunately we have become a society that has to find someone to blame when accidents happen. Slapstick is all about accidents and therefore is too risky and simple to contemplate being sophisticated comedy. Do children see the psychopath or do they just see puppets hitting each other?

The question we therefore have to ask is – Would people complain more if Punch killed his cast members or would they complain more if he didn’t?

Which version would I prefer my son to watch? I would be happy for him to see the original version because at the tender age of two he can understand that puppets only come to life on someone’s hand and that they are not real. He is young enough to find Slapstick hilarious and would probably enjoy the old black and white films made by Laurel and Hardy.

When I wrote this final paragraph I didn’t realise that my son would find people being cruel to each other distressing so I would show him my version, where there is no wife beating and assault just comedy and amusement.

Hey I’m on Mumsnet!!

mumsnet bloggers network

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 324 other subscribers


January 2023

Hey I am On Tots 100!

TOTS100 - UK Parent Blogs